Tax year 2026 · United States federal
The safe harbor rule
Pay 100% of last year’s total tax across four equal instalments and you cannot be penalised this year, no matter what you actually earn. irs.gov
That sentence removes most of the difficulty from quarterly taxes, and almost nobody acts on it. The usual approach is to guess at the current year and hope. The safe harbor asks you to look backwards instead, at a number you already know exactly.
The three doors
You avoid the underpayment penalty if your payments and withholding reach any one of: irs.gov
| Test | Amount | You need to know |
|---|---|---|
| Current year | 90% of this year’s tax | What you will owe — an estimate |
| Prior year | 100% of last year’s tax | Line on last year’s return |
| Prior year, higher earners | 110% of last year’s tax | Same line, if prior AGI was over $150,000 |
You need only one. The IRS applies whichever helps you.
Why the middle one is the useful one
The 90% test requires predicting a year you have not finished. In April you are guessing at December.
The 100% test requires reading one line off a return you already filed. It is not an estimate at all — it is arithmetic on a known number.
Worked through
If 2026 is a much better year, the extra is settled in April 2027. That is a cash-flow decision — money in your account rather than the IRS’s for up to a year — not a penalty.
The $150,000 line
If your AGI on the prior-year return was above $150,000, the prior-year test becomes 110% rather than 100%. irs.gov For married filing separately the threshold is $75,000.
Two details that catch people:
It is prior-year AGI, not this year’s. A big year raises the bar for the following year, not the current one.
And it is AGI, not profit. W-2 wages, a spouse’s income and investment income all count toward it, so a freelancer with modest self-employment income and a high-earning spouse can be over the line without feeling like a high earner.
When the safe harbor does not help
Your first year of self-employment. There is no prior-year liability to point at, so the 100% door does not exist. You are left with the 90% test and a genuine estimate. Recalculating each quarter with actual figures beats committing in April to a projection.
A prior year that was much larger. If last year was exceptional and this year is ordinary, 100% of last year could be far more cash than you owe. The 90% test on the smaller current year is cheaper — or the annualized method if the income is also uneven.
You want the money working elsewhere. The safe harbor is protection from a penalty, not an obligation. Paying less and settling in April is a legitimate choice if you accept the penalty on the shortfall, which is charged as interest rather than as a fine.
Related: the estimated tax guide · uneven income · how much to set aside · the calculator